David Seaton's Energy Links®

"The Stone Age came to an end not for a lack of stones and the oil age will end, but not for a lack of oil.'' 

Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani


 

Table of Contents
Editorial
*Oil Goes Up in Price Because of War - Kommersant
*Oil price rise seen endangering US auto market - Reuters
*US oil firms get little play at Bush-Putin meeting - Washington Post
*Markets Still Uneasy Over Oil and Middle East - New York Times
*Shell, Petroleos Venezuela Agree on Oil Concession - Bloomberg
*Uganda: With Leaders Like Ours, We Need Oil Wealth Like a Hole in the Head - The East African - Nairobi


David Seaton's Energy Links® Editorial - In Afghanistan, the wars begin when they end  Afghanistan came tragically close this week as Spain lost its first soldier to enemy fire in that country. What until recently had been seen as a model NATO mission appears to be going sour. Certainly those who were quick to declare the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan a victory were speaking too soon. Often imperial British experiences in Afghanistan come to life in today’s headlines. Cristina Lamb who has been covering Afghanistan for the Sunday Times for over 20 years quotes Sir Olaf Caroe, the last British governor of North West Frontier Province. “Unlike other wars, Afghan wars become serious only when they are over”. Lamb quotes Lieutenant-General David Richards, British commander of the Nato-led peacekeeping force. “We need to realize that we could actually fail here, think of the psychological victory for Bin Laden and his ilk if we failed and the Taliban came back.” Obviously of vital importance, isn’t it? But the questions of why Bin Laden was ever allowed to escape from Tora Bora in December of 2001 or why the resources that could have pacified and reconstructed Afghanistan were uselessly diverted to Iraq are never answered.

With opium production back at record levels and the suspiciously re-armed and suspiciously well trained Taliban back on the attack, the Guardian’s Simon Jenkins affirms that today’s British soldier is “dying not to prop up an embattled regime in Kabul, for which they are hopelessly undermanned, but to keep NATO alive in Europe”. Quentin Peel of the Financial Times wrote that failure in Afghanistan “would very possibly spell the end of the Nato alliance, whose reinvention as a peacekeeping and peace-making force far beyond its European limits would be fatally called into question.” If the whole future of NATO really depends on its success in Afghanistan, then there might be some choice office space going for rent on the Boulevard Leopold III in Brussels before long.

Afghanistan is the pivot of South Asia and South Asia, like the Middle East, is on the boil. On the 7th of July, India, recently declared a strategic ally of the US, test-fired a long-range missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead more than 3,000km. On 11-7 a massive, coordinated, terrorist attack with explosives, similar to the 11-M attack in Madrid, took place in Mumbai. Certainly both the missile test and the train bombs were messages being sent. How many are left in the mailbox?
David Seaton


David Seaton's Energy Links®

Oil Goes Up in Price Because of War - Kommersant
Oil prices became higher than ever one day before the G-8 summit in St. Petersburg which has measures for stabilizing energy markets as a key issue on its agenda. The main reason for the price upsurge is the upcoming of a new war in Middle East. Brent oil reached a historic maximum of $78.03 for barrel (futures for August) yesterday at 11 a.m. Moscow time. WTI/Light Sweet oil grew up to $78.40 for barrel at NYMEX just as George Bush’s airplane was landing in St. Petersburg international airport Pulkovo. Oil prices also grew in Tokyo, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The prices went down a little bit (between $77-78) by the evening. However, it is clear that should any bad news come, the G-8 leaders will begin session with a new world price on oil--$80 for barrel. The upsurge was first of all caused by news on Israel’s special operation in Lebanon. Another act of sabotage against Nigeria’s pipelines and the upcoming discussion of Iran’s nuclear program issue in the G-8 also contributed to price rise. Moreover, if Syria joins in the Israeli-Lebanon conflict, and no good news come from St. Petersburg, oil prices might go up to $90-100, believe traders.
Click here to read more 
Contents


Oil price rise seen endangering US auto market - Reuters
Already reeling from the consumer flight from SUVs and trucks, U.S. automakers now face the risk that higher oil prices will trigger a sales downturn of the kind that the auto industry has not seen in more than a decade, analysts said on Friday. Oil prices surged to an all-time high of $78.40 a barrel on Friday on fears the conflict between Israel and Hizbollah guerrillas could widen, and some energy market analysts have said oil could touch $100 a barrel. That figure implies future U.S. gasoline prices of $4 a gallon, up from just under $3 on average last week. "If gas settled $4 a gallon, like it has at $3 a gallon, then I think we could anticipate consumers changing their buying habits," said Rebecca Lindland, auto analyst with consulting firm Global Insight. "One of the things they may do is just stay out of the market altogether." U.S. vehicle sales slowed only marginally in the first half of 2006, but consumers defected from gas-guzzling pick-up trucks and SUVs, a trend that has hurt General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler's Chrysler Group. Overall U.S. vehicle sales were trending at near 16.6 million units in the first half of 2006, down from 16.9 million last year but almost directly on track with the pace of sales in 2004. High energy prices combined with a weakening U.S. housing market and rising interest rates will dampen economic growth and consumer confidence, auto industry analysts said. Even if an outright recession is avoided, economic growth of less than 2 percent could tip auto sales into a cyclical downturn, said Bob Schnorbus, chief economist at J.D. Power and Associates. "At $4 per gallon we might not see a recession but we might see growth slowing enough to cause an auto recession or a down cycle," said Schnorbus. "It's certainly a significant threat to the market." Global Insight's Lindland estimates that for every $10 increase in price of crude oil, overall U.S. annual vehicle sales would contract by 200,000 to 400,000 units. "At some point ... it won't be a matter of buying something smaller, it will be a matter of not buying anything at all," said Kevin Tynan, analyst with Argus Research. Part of the problem for the U.S. auto industry, analysts said, is the success that it has had in propping up sales over the past five years through aggressive sales incentives and discounts. "They have fueled unit sales but what they have really done is pull demand forward," said John Novak, an analyst with Morningstar. "So I think there is a significant risk." The slowdown that took hold in 2001 for the U.S. auto industry was far more muted than past downturns for an industry that has been marked by sharp boom-and-bust cycles. U.S. auto sales slipped just 4 percent between 2001 and 2003. By contrast, the last time sales were down for three consecutive years, they fell a combined 20 percent between 1989 and 1991. In the U.S. auto industry's deepest recession, which hit between 1980 and 1982, sales plunged by a full 25 percent from their peak. If there is a cyclical downturn ahead for the industry, analysts said U.S. giants GM and Ford have the most to lose. Both companies have announced plans to cut some 60,000 factory jobs and shutter two dozen plants to adjust to their loss of market share. "They would be expected to bear the brunt of the losses based on their product lineup," Novak said. On the bright side, the U.S. economy and the auto industry have shown surprising resilience so far even though oil prices have risen 27 percent this year, analysts said. Japanese automakers Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. have also seen strong U.S. sales growth, boosted by the fuel-efficiency of their vehicle offerings. U.S. sales for Toyota rose 10 percent in the first half, while Honda gained 7 percent. "If anyone asked me a year ago, I would have said $3 a gallon would have diminished demand but people seem to have adjusted," Novak said.
Click here to read more 
Contents


US oil firms get little play at Bush-Putin meeting - Washington Post
President George W. Bush did not press the case during almost two hours of private talks on Saturday with Russian President Vladimir that a U.S. company should be selected to help develop a giant Russian natural gas field, Bush's national security adviser said. Putin has made energy security a major theme at this weekend's meeting of the Group of Eight (G8) rich nations in St Petersburg, and U.S. companies are hoping Bush will push Putin to open more of Russia's oil and gas sector to investment. In particular, U.S.-based ConocoPhillips (COP.N) and Chevron (CVX.N) are competing with three other foreign energy firms to be picked to partner Russian energy giant Gazprom (GAZP.MM) to develop the prized Shtokman gas field in the Barents Sea. Bush and Putin held a private meeting for almost two hours on Saturday morning before the official start of the G8. While many issues were discussed, energy was not a major topic and the president skipped the opportunity altogether to promote a U.S. energy company for developing the Shtokman field, according to National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley. "It didn't figure largely in their discussions today (and) that particular (Shtokman) case did not come up," he told reporters during a briefing on the talks. Hadley said energy issues were scheduled to be discussed later by the G8 leaders at the summit. However, energy is now seen as a minor issue in order to deal with more urgent matters like new fighting in the Middle East, Iran's nuclear program and North Korea's test firing of missiles. Some energy experts have suggested a U.S. company would not likely be picked to develop the Shtokman field unless the United States works out its differences with Russia joining the World Trade Organization. After several days of intense negotiations this week, U.S. and Russian officials were unable to reach a WTO deal in time for the G8 summit. Other experts argue that it would be in Russia's interest to pick a U.S. partner since Gazprom wants to super-cool Shtokman's gas into liquefied natural gas (LNG) and ship it to America. Also, it would be easier for Gazprom to buy a stake, without much opposition from Congress, in a U.S. LNG import terminal if an American firm was involved in Shtokman, they say. The other hopefuls competing for a part of Shtokman, one of the world's biggest but most technically challenging gas fields, are France's Total (TOTF.PA) and Norwegian firms Statoil (STL.OL) and Norsk Hydro (NHY.OL). Both Hadley and U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab said they did not believe the decision on Stockman would be linked to the United States backing Russia's accession to the WTO. "I can say for the policy side that there has been no linkage of any other issue to the WTO succession agreement (with Russia)," Hadley said. "These trade agreements...are done by the book on the merits, with an eye toward what works and will get accepted by the Congress. And that's how it should be," he said. USTR Schwab agreed, saying: "There has no been no tie between the negotiations of (Russia's) WTO accession agreement and any other issue."
Click here to read more
Contents


Markets Still Uneasy Over Oil and Middle East - New York Times
Stocks deepened their losses for the week today and oil prices inched closer to $80 a barrel as the worsening conflict in the Middle East hung uneasily over commodities and equities markets. Today marked day three of a losing streak for American stocks, which were also pummeled by some discouraging reports about consumer spending and confidence that gave investors yet another reason to drive prices lower. The benchmark Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index closed today just 12.5 points away from its yearly low, declining 0.5 percent. The Dow Jones industrial average had its third consecutive day of 100-point losses, closing down 1 percent. The Nasdaq composite also closed the day down about 1 percent. For the week, the losses were heavier: 2.3 percent for the S&P, 3.2 percent for the Dow and 4.4 percent for the Nasdaq. On the New York Mercantile Exchange, oil prices broke past the record set just Thursday of $76.70 a barrel. The new price of a barrel of oil for delivery in August shot to $77.95 before finishing the day at $77.03. While $80-a-barrel oil seemed like a skeptic’s worst-case scenario a few months ago, oil traders are increasingly saying that it is now just a matter of time before prices cross that threshold. Oil futures contracts for delivery beyond this summer passed $80 a barrel for the first time on Thursday. “The feeling is that we’re in a fairly bullish market right now,” said Antoine Halff, head of research at Fimat. “Gas demand over the last few weeks has been very robust. Perhaps the bigger issue on top of that is geopolitics. And clearly the market is very jittery about what’s going on in Israel.” Oil markets are typically sensitive to any political instability in the Middle East. Recently, they have been unsettled by Israeli military incursions into Gaza and then, this week, Lebanon. But in this case, a market already worried about the potential for conflict with Iran and North Korea over their nuclear programs is growing even more anxious. William Rhodes, chief investment strategist at Rhodes Analytics, said, “People are scared, that’s the bottom line.” Analysts said that in such a tense environment, events that typically would be overlooked are scrutinized, resulting in the type of market reaction seen after reports today indicated surprisingly weak retail sales and lowered consumer confidence. The Commerce Department said that retail sales fell by 0.1 percent in June, on a seasonally adjusted basis, the first drop since February. Taken with a University of Michigan survey that showed falling consumer confidence, the reports were seen as signs that consumers are growing weary. “In another week, those reports would not have been as destructive to the market,” said James W. Paulsen, chief investment strategist for Wells Capital Management. How resilient consumer spending proves to be is something that will continue to factor heavily into stock performance. Most economists believe that consumers will curb their spending somewhat as the year goes on, and economic growth is expected to slow. But there is disagreement over how much spending will slow. “The persistence of high gasoline prices, coupled with lower equity prices and lower consumer sentiment, will restrain the growth of real consumer spending in the second half of 2006,” Brian Bethune, an analyst with Global Insight, wrote today in a report about the retail sales numbers. But many analysts noted that the month’s decline in retail sales was exaggerated by poor auto sales, and said consumers are likely to keep shopping for other goods. “We do not think that consumer spending growth is going to fall off of a cliff, as there ought to be support derived by gains in wages and salaries owing to job growth.” said Joshua Shapiro, chief United States economist with MFR Inc. Two indicators of market volatility — bond prices and gold prices — pointed today toward renewed nervousness. Gold, a safe-haven investment, gained. Bond prices also went up. Even though the market swooned this week, analysts said that there are no signs yet that the drop was part of a larger unraveling of the economy. “The fundamentals of this market are still O.K.,” Mr. Paulsen said. “The decline is not universal. It’s not like stock prices are falling, bond yields are collapsing, commodities prices are collapsing. The stock market looks recessionary, but the commodities market looks like it’s expanding.” Mr. Rhodes said that with so much bad news clouding the market, “It’s very, very difficult to find out what the real underlying trend is.” He went on, “And the longer this goes on, the more difficult it is to find out what’s real happening underneath.”
Click here to read more

Contents


Shell, Petroleos Venezuela Agree on Oil Concession - Bloomberg
Royal Dutch/Shell Group, Europe's second-largest oil company, reached agreement with Venezuela's state oil company to explore a heavy oil block in the South American country. A memorandum of understanding may be signed as early as today between the two companies, said a spokesman for Caracas-based Petroleos de Venezuela. Shell may be given a block in the Ayacucho field in the Faja, or heavy oil belt, to explore and certify the reserves, the spokesman said. The companies may release details of the agreement later tonight, said the spokesman. The accord is expected to be signed during a meeting between visiting Shell Chief Executive Officer Jeroen van der Veer and Petroleos de Venezuela President Rafael Ramirez. Petroleos de Venezuela is granting companies such as Shell, Repsol YPF SA, Petroleo Brasileiro SA and OAO Lukoil, blocks in the Faja to explore as a prelude to development. Venezuela's heavy oil-deposits may rival Canada's tar sands as an alternative source of crude to satisfy increasing global demand. Rising oil prices have made the Faja and tar sands more feasible economically. President Hugo Chavez has said that the Faja may hold up to 235 billion barrels of oil. Sean Rooney, Shell's Venezuelan manager, declined comment on a possible agreement. Shell proposed creating a heavy oil joint venture with Petroleos de Venezuela in 2004, using new technology. At that time, Shell officials said the venture would require an investment of between $4 billion and $8 billion. Venezuela stopped development of the Faja in July 2005 to allow for exploration and certification of the area's crude reserves. The certification process, which includes third-party verification, will take up to two years, Petroleos de Venezuela said. The heavy-oil belt has been divided into 27 blocks. Petroleos de Venezuela and its partners are working on geological surveys and exploratory drilling to determine the area's reserves. Blocks will be auctioned when the certification process is finished, Ramirez said last month. Companies that are undertaking the exploration and certification will have an inside track due to the knowledge of the fields, he said. Venezuela has relied on foreign oil companies to help develop its extra-heavy oil reserves in the Faja, a region above the Orinoco River in the eastern states of Monagas and in Anzoategui. Petroleos de Venezuela has four joint ventures with foreign producers to pump crude oil from the Orinoco Belt to the Caribbean coast for export to refineries in the U.S. and other countries. The four produce about 600,000 barrels a day. Partners include Chevron Corp., Total SA, and ConocoPhillips. BP Plc is Europe's largest oil company.
Click here to read more
Contents


Uganda: With Leaders Like Ours, We Need Oil Wealth Like a Hole in the Head - The East African - Nairobi
If you thought you understood Ugandans, think again. Here is a nation that has been suffering from poverty, a huge debt and general deprivation, now standing on the threshold to great wealth, after literally striking oil. You would have expected general excitement in the population, right? Wrong. The common reaction is cynicism. At best, caution and at worst, outright anger. Many of our people are reacting with the uncertainty of a man who has been in prison for decades and is unsure whether he will be able to utilise the freedom when it is finally granted. Many Ugandans feel that not only do our weak institutions not have the capacity to deliver the benefits from the oil wealth to reach the general population, but our woefully corrupt public officials will ensure that nothing of the sort happens, once exploitation and exportation start. Tests for quality and quantity of the few oil wells so far checked are more than encouraging. It is a question of time; probably, in a couple of years, the country will start exporting oil, a commodity whose prices and demand are rising worldwide every day. We should all be excited and in high spirits. So why aren't we? Part of the answer lies is our post-independence history. While the pre-colonial and colonial rulers used to devote the bulk of national resources to the benefit of the country, post-independence governments were characterised by mismanagement and embezzlement. They stole the little collected in taxes, stole donations and even stole borrowed money. Still vivid in the public mind is the way officials have been stealing Global Fund money meant for the treatment of Aids patients. If public officials could not spare the little money that was meant to save lives, how can they resist looting the royalties and taxes from the oil bonanza? In Uganda, nobody is under any illusion that there is any shred of goodwill and honourable intentions among the senior leaders of government. The public have it on the recent authority of none other than the Vice President of the Republic of Uganda, Prof Gilbert Bukenya, that the government is in the grip of mafia ministers whose sole aim is grabbing public resources for their private enrichment. In such a situation, do you blame an ordinary Ugandan for not being excited to hear that their country is joining the ranks of the oil exporting nations? Today, everyone is talking of the curse of oil in Nigeria. Will we also fight a civil war with Bunyoro, that neglected kingdom that the British colonialists hated with a passion because King Kabalega resisted them? Today, the Banyoro have sued the Queen of England for trillions in reparations for colonial plunder and murder in the 19th century. Now the oil is in their kingdom, and it is the rest of Uganda that is set to "plunder" Bunyoro. Are they going to set some conditions like investment in the environmental, which we shall duly ignore while proceeding to kill a few Saro Wiwas there? Do we have the honour and common sense to invest a large portion of the oil proceeds in environmental protection and high-quality education for the future? Even if our public officials become honest overnight, do they have the negotiating power to get the best from the foreign investors who will be exploiting the oil? Our informed people are painfully aware of the story of our East African partner, Tanzania, where rich gold reserves are being exploited at negligible benefit to the nationals, leading MPs in Dodoma to helplessly cry that the country would be better off if the gold were left undisturbed in the ground. There are others who claim that oil will breed dictatorship in Uganda. They say it will be impossible for leaders to avoid the temptation of clinging to power and hence remaining in charge of the billions of dollars from oil. Is it right to have such a low level of trust in our leaders or are they the ones who have caused the distrust over the decades? The next few years are going to be interesting to watch. Donors who have just forgiven our foreign debt should wait before they close their wallets. We might still be begging for aid 10 years from now, having scattered our oil wealth to the four winds.
Click here to read more
Contents


 

David Seaton's News Links®

Thought provoking, action oriented articles from the English language Internet

admin@seatonsnet.com


Back to the top of the page

Remember that links from newspapers and magazines online are "here today and gone tomorrow": our advice is to download them into a folder on your desktop immediately or better yet print them out for reading when you have time. Don't leave them till you get around to them... They may have changed by then!